ittaku Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 All hail google. http://news.softpedia.com/news/google-brain-creates-technology-that-can-zoom-in-and-enhance-pixelated-images-512688.shtml I'm sure you all know what I'm thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchhamilton Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) ah yeah ittaku. I CAN FINALLY CALL OUT ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS FOR CONFESSING SOMEONES CRIME! HA! teach you guys to do that right thing! Edited February 8, 2017 by mitchhamilton Ariurotl 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eclipsed Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Cool, this will bring new meaning to 'just Google it' whenever people complaints about pixelated censorships in da futures Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiddle Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Quote What is this sorcery, you ask? Well, it’s Google combining two neural networks. The first one, the conditioning network, works to map the 8x8 pixel source image against other high-resolution images. Basically, it downsizes other high-res images to the same 8x8 size and tries to make a match on the features. Alas, this will lead to the representation of VN genitalia as much larger than they actually are, considering how many of my own such photos are circulating throughout the Interwebs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanahtlig Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Sorry, but it's only going to solve minor pixelation by upsampling. Best-case scenario is that it'll match mosaiced and unmosaiced images and serve up the unmosaiced one instead--but that's already possible with existing image matching technologies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ittaku Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 No need to take me seriously... For this to work google would need a massive bank of uncensored 2D hentai images which I doubt they have... or at least they won't admit to having, or give us public access to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soulless Watcher Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 5 minutes ago, ittaku said: No need to take me seriously... For this to work google would need a massive bank of uncensored 2D hentai images which I doubt they have... or at least they won't admit to having, or give us public access to. That was probably part of the 20% of the dark web that Anonymous shut down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nandemonai Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 3 hours ago, ittaku said: I'm sure you all know what I'm thinking. Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreamysyu Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Why do I have a feeling that this turns out to be another Google Translate. ittaku 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barktooth Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 To be fair, we already had stuff like this for a while: http://waifu2x.booru.pics/ Still, quite impressive that it can produce something remotely human-looking from an 8x8 image. Segai 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narcosis Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 A dead end road, though. You can't create something out of nothing, especially in terms of ultra low resolution graphics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ittaku Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Narcosis said: A dead end road, though. You can't create something out of nothing, especially in terms of ultra low resolution graphics. Normally yes, but that's not what this is doing... it's trying to match from tiny amounts of data what is in its massive database to recreate the missing data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narcosis Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, ittaku said: Normally yes, but that's not what this is doing... it's trying to match from tiny amounts of data what is in its massive database to recreate the missing data. It's not recreating data. It's basically guessing how the input should look like at a higher resolution - in this case, a resolution "high enough" to actually allow enough minimum detail. The end result is preety much a guess work and will vary with every single iteration. "Recreating" is a process of piecing the remains of something together to bring it back to it's former shape and look; if there's not enough data or it's missing, the end results might end in a falsification. Dreamysyu 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ittaku Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 Actually with a bit of manual cropping, minimal interpolation and some layer/mask magic I can reduce pixels in the pixelated region to 1/4 their size without any manual drawing, thus retaining only the original artist's work in a less pixelated form. Unlike redrawing the result still looks like part of the original and requires no drawing skills on my part. Here' s a rough example I slapped together for demonstration (obviously nsfw below): Spoiler NSFW: Before: http://i.imgur.com/hTXsdb4.png After: http://i.imgur.com/pgCuwDV.png It's pretty time consuming but kinda fun to do, and I guess I could improve a little bit on it by being more careful in my cropping. I have previously tried to automate the process but the manual input is crucial since they often overlay detail (usually bodily fluids...) within the pixelated regions. Nandemonai 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ningen Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 48 minutes ago, ittaku said: It's pretty time consuming but kinda fun to do, and I guess I could improve a little bit on it by being more careful in my cropping. Redrawing probably looks better and is faster than what you are trying there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ittaku Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 31 minutes ago, Ningen said: Redrawing probably looks better and is faster than what you are trying there. Well fortunately I do have someone redrawing for me on that very project. It was just a fun experiment. As I said, though, no redrawing will ever be the original artist's vision (if he/she had one and drew lots more detail at the time only to pixelate it, which isn't always the case.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.