Jump to content

(Video) Republican delegates pressed for specifics on how to build and enforce Trump's wall with Mexico


Recommended Posts

oh my god. how... i cant... god i hate that people actually support that close minded idiot to this extent. they are just blind people who hear an ideal they like and just accept it. without thinking about how its even possible. noooo way is mexico paying for this wall. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGHH!!!! why is this guy so popular!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fiddle said:

Alright, we talkin direct urethra-to-cornea urination, or will it be transferred through a secondary container? Because I gotta make an informed vote here.

i will bend my body so i am face to face with my wee-wee. i know i can do it! ive been doing it for years so i could... um... EXAMINE MYSELF! yeah, yeah, examine myself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you trying to say/prove with this video? We all know the average american is grossly misinformed by mass media and  you could find the same types of responses for Clinton supporters, especially with organizations such as BLM. 

Also Trump is the best candidate we have. Hilary is a known liar, and not only is she a liar but a criminal as well. With all the cases of refugees and what not destabilizing Europe I am glad that we are taking more of an isolationist stand with trump, and although I may not completely agree with his ideals, I would take isolation any day if that would mean we wouldn't end up under sharia law by 2020 with Hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, iamnoob said:

As someone who lives on the other side of the world. While I think it is madness if Trump becomes president, at the same time if he does....

*popcorn*

The President of the US holds the codes to an arsenal of nuclear weapons capable of devastating civilization.  We're all in this together, mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, spademan said:

What are you trying to say/prove with this video?

I think the main point is that the wall with Mexico is the centerpiece of Trump's policy goals, yet his supporters that are actively involved in the political process all have different ideas of what the policy *actually is*.

Some supporters appear to believe that the wall is a metaphor (to galvanize anti-immigrant sentiments?).  Not an actual policy goal.

Some supporters believe that Trump's wall will be the realization of prior initiatives to construct a fence that stretches the entire border.

Other supporters believe that Trump's wall will be analogous to the Berlin Wall / Great Wall of China, staffed by military personnel like a military base and with intruders shot on sight. 

That's clearly a policy failure.  His policy is so incoherent even his own supporters have no idea what he means.  Certainly politicians in the past and present have been guilty of similar failures, but not on the same scale as Trump.  He's literally a demagogue with no coherent policy objectives at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, sanahtlig said:

I think the main point is that the wall with Mexico is the centerpiece of Trump's policy goals, yet his supporters that are actively involved in the political process all have different ideas of what the policy *actually is*.

Some supporters appear to believe that the wall is a metaphor (to galvanize anti-immigrant sentiments?).  Not an actual policy goal.

Some supporters believe that Trump's wall will be the realization of prior initiatives to construct a fence that stretches the entire border.

Other supporters believe that Trump's wall will be analogous to the Berlin Wall / Great Wall of China, staffed by military personnel like a military base and with intruders shot on sight. 

That's clearly a policy failure.  His policy is so incoherent even his own supporters have no idea what he means.  Certainly politicians in the past and present have been guilty of similar failures, but not on the same scale as Trump.  He's literally a demagogue with no coherent policy objectives at all.

Again, with liberal news like fox, CNN, etc DOMINATING the mass media it would come of no surprise that his supporters would be uninformed. I will concede that his communication on how the wall will be built is flawed but take this as an example. 

1961, JFK announced intentions to  land a man safely on the moon. Would JFK be able to explain to the average man on how he plans to do that? No, that is for the R&D, specialists and what not.  I would view this as similar to trump despite the fact that his policies do revolve around it. 

I would say Hilary's goals are far more unrealistic however as she pretty much umbrella's almost every minority and social issue that is prevalent in america today.  Not even mentioning the fact that her plans aren't economically feasible but I wonder how she plans to operate with a gop dominated house and possible 50/50 gop dominated senate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we may end up calling him President. Not like the Democrats helped their case either by crowning Hillary behind the scenes (and looking like dicks doing it), basically pissing on the Democrats Bernie Sanders managed to mobilize in ways her uninspired ass could. Even if he wasn't really a party member for years he was still eligible for impartial treatment from the party when he joined and tossed his hat in the ring. That clearly didn't happen. (And sure, we all suspected it, but the ugly proof is out there. And trying to deflect it with the whole BUT IT WAS THE RUSSIANS thing is weak - these same people would be loving it if it was Anonymous exposing something that helped them.)

2016 ... this election already is popcorn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mitchhamilton said:

i will piss in my own eyes if trump becomes president.

Bookmarked. 

19 minutes ago, spademan said:

1961, JFK announced intentions to  land a man safely on the moon. Would JFK be able to explain to the average man on how he plans to do that? No, that is for the R&D, specialists and what not.  I would view this as similar to trump despite the fact that his policies do revolve around it. 

Specialists have already come out and said why building a wall stretching the whole border is unfeasible. Also the wall will go through much public land, like National Parks, which will take negotiation through Congress, which will never happen.

Which is why his 2,000 mile wall has suddenly become a 1,000 mile wall. When he was talking about "natural barriers" I'm sure he was talking about barriers for himself and not for the Mexicans. A classic "oh shit" moment.

But Trump doesn't have to be "right" to win this election. 

Anyway in case anyone is curious, here's the 5 reasons Michael Moore thinks Trump will win: http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, spademan said:

Again, with liberal news like fox, CNN, etc DOMINATING the mass media it would come of no surprise that his supporters would be uninformed.

Since when did hardcore conservatives listen to the liberal mass media?  They don't.  They listen to conservative media.  We're not talking about random Joe Smoe Republican who reads the news occasionally.  These are DELEGATES, Republican operatives who do their groundwork and are tasked with managing the campaign.  They should be as well-informed as we could reasonably expect non-experts to be.  If the Trump campaign can't keep these people informed then substantive conversation with voters is IMPOSSIBLE.  How can you answer critics when your own allies have no idea what you're talking about?

This isn't on the level of what the wall will be made of.  We're talking basic concepts like whether there will even be a wall and who will pay for it.  Quite literally, this isn't rocket science.  They should be able to agree on this.  If they can't, then either the campaign's messaging is woefully inadequate or even his supporters don't think Trump means what he says.  Wasn't the campaign message supposed to be that Trump *does* mean what he says?

56 minutes ago, spademan said:

I would say Hilary's goals are far more unrealistic however as she pretty much umbrella's almost every minority and social issue that is prevalent in america today.  Not even mentioning the fact that her plans aren't economically feasible but I wonder how she plans to operate with a gop dominated house and possible 50/50 gop dominated senate

Hillary has detailed proposals and talks about them during debates.  So did Jeb Bush.  Trump is the outlier here.  More importantly, Hillary knows what she's talking about (as did the Republican candidates running against Obama).  Trump is uniquely unqualified as a policy maker, which shouldn't be surprising since he has no background in policy.  He's just a know-nothing insurgent riding a popular wave of anti-establishment sentiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, solidbatman said:

ooooh a Fuwa politics thread. I am sure to love these super informed opinions, sweeping generalizations, and of course, apocalyptic predictions. Its like 1996, and 2000, and 2004, and 2008, and 2012 all over again. 

If you love reading them, then you wouldn't mind 'liking' everybody's posts. Yes? Good man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sanahtlig said:

Hillary has detailed proposals and talks about them during debates.  So did Jeb Bush.  Trump is the outlier here.  More importantly, Hillary knows what she's talking about (as did the Republican candidates running against Obama).  Trump is uniquely unqualified as a policy maker, which shouldn't be surprising since he has no background in policy.  He's just a know-nothing insurgent riding a popular wave of anti-establishment sentiment.

Actually, Trump is completely qualified. Of course, so am I.

There's only three requirements to become President of the United States. Having a background in policy is absent.

Be a natural born US Citizen, be 35 years old or older, live here for 14 years prior to running. That's it.

Any other qualification is completely up to the voter to decide. Frank Stallone can become President if we wanted.

Of course, one would think we would want people who supposedly know what they're doing. Unfortunately, those candidates also leave a pretty bad taste in people's mouths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh the good ol' 2 (3?) year campaign is nearing its end. How many billions have they spent to get the nominates pest for the Republicans and cholera from the Democrats? I would laugh if Europe didn't have their own damn problems. 

But these videos are actually a bit unfair. Just that a amount of people are less intelligent and just follow what's popular and what someone is telling you still shouldn't make fun of them (even though I think they are dead serious themselves). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SilverLi said:

But these videos are actually a bit unfair. Just that a amount of people are less intelligent and just follow what's popular and what someone is telling you still shouldn't make fun of them (even though I think they are dead serious themselves). 

These aren't random people off the street.  They're delegates.  These people chose to be representatives for the Republican party and they likely have some role in the party machine.  Many of these people will be calling households, putting up flyers, and knocking on doors.  If you don't want to be ridiculed, you don't involve yourself in politics, and you certainly don't give reporters permission to tape you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, sanahtlig said:

These aren't random people off the street.  They're delegates.  These people chose to be representatives for the Republican party and they likely have some role in the party machine.  Many of these people will be calling households, putting up flyers, and knocking on doors.  If you don't want to be ridiculed, you don't involve yourself in politics, and you certainly don't give reporters permission to tape you.

Ok that's horrible. I thought they were random people supporting Trump. But it looks like I wasn't reading the title that closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BookwormOtaku said:

I oppose any government efforts to step up enforcement of pornography laws until they can figure out the difference between fiction and reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...