-
Posts
3738 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Reputation Activity
-
Down got a reaction from KuroganeHomura in Dies Irae Steam Confirmed (Prefundia Up Now)
It's okay that means Dies is shit too
Actually from what I gather from my more trustworthy sources (batman and Rooke) all VNs are shit anyway, no reason to hype all that much.
-
Down got a reaction from solidbatman in Dies Irae Steam Confirmed (Prefundia Up Now)
It's okay that means Dies is shit too
Actually from what I gather from my more trustworthy sources (batman and Rooke) all VNs are shit anyway, no reason to hype all that much.
-
Down got a reaction from Caio000 in Dies Irae Steam Confirmed (Prefundia Up Now)
It's okay that means Dies is shit too
Actually from what I gather from my more trustworthy sources (batman and Rooke) all VNs are shit anyway, no reason to hype all that much.
-
-
Down got a reaction from Funyarinpa in Fuwanovel Confessions
Y'know, this isn't gonna go anywhere if someone doesn't concretely lists what plot holes they think there are in Steins;Gate so we can examine them.
-
Down got a reaction from Darklord Rooke in Fuwanovel Confessions
Y'know, this isn't gonna go anywhere if someone doesn't concretely lists what plot holes they think there are in Steins;Gate so we can examine them.
-
Down got a reaction from Mr Poltroon in Fuwanovel Confessions
Y'know, this isn't gonna go anywhere if someone doesn't concretely lists what plot holes they think there are in Steins;Gate so we can examine them.
-
Down got a reaction from Kenshin_sama in Fuwanovel Confessions
Y'know, this isn't gonna go anywhere if someone doesn't concretely lists what plot holes they think there are in Steins;Gate so we can examine them.
-
Down got a reaction from john 'mr. customer' smith in Fuwanovel Confessions
Y'know, this isn't gonna go anywhere if someone doesn't concretely lists what plot holes they think there are in Steins;Gate so we can examine them.
-
-
-
Down reacted to Fiddle in (Video) Republican delegates pressed for specifics on how to build and enforce Trump's wall with Mexico
Alright, we talkin direct urethra-to-cornea urination, or will it be transferred through a secondary container? Because I gotta make an informed vote here.
-
Down got a reaction from Kenshin_sama in "Transfer to another world" Trend?
It's a definite current trend and people are keenly aware of it, see for example this blog post about some of the japanese fandom's reaction to it.
-
Down got a reaction from Makudomi in "Transfer to another world" Trend?
It's a definite current trend and people are keenly aware of it, see for example this blog post about some of the japanese fandom's reaction to it.
-
Down got a reaction from dfbreezy in Fuwanovel coup d'etat?
You'll have to wait in line, I've infiltrated the fuwa mod team years ago in order to execute my plan to start a Revolution and make Fuwa a marxist state.
-
Down got a reaction from Khazit in Fuwanovel coup d'etat?
You'll have to wait in line, I've infiltrated the fuwa mod team years ago in order to execute my plan to start a Revolution and make Fuwa a marxist state.
-
Down got a reaction from Kenshin_sama in Brexit.
I like a lot this analysis of Brexit by Glenn Greenwald which puts it in a broader perspective. I think he's right on many points.
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25/brexit-is-only-the-latest-proof-of-the-insularity-and-failure-of-western-establishment-institutions/
-
Down got a reaction from Rahman N in Recommendations - READ BEFORE ASKING
Looking for a new VN to read? Need a recommendation?
Please read this before starting a new thread.
If you don't find what you want here/want something very specific because you have particular tastes, feel free to start a thread.
Try to be specific about your demand. If all you want is something good regardless of genre or particular elements, just consult the lists below, they have tons of stuff.
Member Lists
Some members compiled some lists of good titles. Maybe you will find what you want to read there.
The Fuwanovel list of Notable OELVNs
50 translated VN you should read before you die
Another 50 translated VNs to read before you die
Non-Ero VNs
"Get the hell out of here" VNs
Top 10 dark VNs to read before you die
50 untranslated VNs to read before you die
Clephas' lists:
Science-fiction (translated and untranslated)
Chuuni (see what he means by that in the thread) (translated and untranslated)
Fantasy (translated and untranslated)
Kamige (translated and untranslated)
For beginners (untranslated)
Everything else (untranslated)
Ecchi (borderline non-nukige) (untranslated)
Gameplay (untranslated)
Chicken soup for the soul (see definition inside) (untranslated)
Catharsis (untranslated)
Existing threads
Someone might already have asked for what you're looking for. Here are some already answered demands: (note: those are most probably old threads, don't reply to them or at least check the date)
VN with gameplay
VN with a Christmas setting
Romance with happy ending
VN with animation
VN with incest
VN with an older main character
Astronomy, star mythology
Loli VNs
VN with non-human heroines
...If you see threads to add to that list, feel free to PM me or another mod.
-
Down got a reaction from Silvz in Should I buy Star ocean even with the petty censorship?
Are you asking because you actually wanted an advice or did you just want to make a thread to complain about muh panty censorship?
-
Down got a reaction from solidbatman in Should I buy Star ocean even with the petty censorship?
Are you asking because you actually wanted an advice or did you just want to make a thread to complain about muh panty censorship?
-
Down got a reaction from Zakamutt in Brexit.
I like a lot this analysis of Brexit by Glenn Greenwald which puts it in a broader perspective. I think he's right on many points.
https://theintercept.com/2016/06/25/brexit-is-only-the-latest-proof-of-the-insularity-and-failure-of-western-establishment-institutions/
-
Down got a reaction from Eclipsed in Astronomy
Aside from what Flutterz said, if you were going towards it at not the speed of light but a bit less (let's say 0.9 times the speed of light), it would actually appear to be slower. In special relativity there's this fucked up thing called time dilation.
-
Down got a reaction from Darklord Rooke in Astronomy
The simplest spectroscope you could imagine, and indeed what was used by astronomers a century or two ago, is a prism. A prism deviates each wavelength of light by a different angle and thus allows to view what we call the "spectrum" of the light, i.e. what wavelength we can find in it. Spectroscopy in general is very broad, though.
The explanation iamnoob gave is actually only partial: if you observed the light of the sun through a prism, as you know, you'd see a continuous spectrum (i.e. all the wavelength would be there). That's because the light emitted by stars does not come from the transitions of the atoms in it, but from what is called "black-body radiation", which is purely due to temperature. A physical body without particular other optical properties (hence the black-body term) will emit light according to its temperature, in the form of a continuous spectrum. The peak of this spectrum depends on temperature: on the surface of the sun, around 6000K, the center is around visible light. Cooler stars will look red, hotter stars blue. For bodies at ~300K (30°C) it would be pretty far in the infrared. Yes, we do radiate too.
What happens then is that a part of that black-body radiation is absorbed by the molecules within the stars (the absorption spectrum of a molecule is simply the complementary of its emission spectra), creating small gaps in the otherwise continuous spectrum (not really visible with the naked eye and a simple prism). We can compare those gaps with the known emission spectras of various molecules we test on earth and match them onto the star's spectra.
Emission spectras are more useful when we want information on other stuff like gas clouds in the interstellar medium. Molecules in those regions can get into excited states because of all the shit going around (cosmic rays etc) and then emit light at specific wavelengths which allows us to identify them.
Of course that's only the basics of it: in reality it's more complicated. Stars are mostly made of hydrogen, so it's very easy to see the marks of hydrogen in a spectrum. There's also a bunch of Helium, but the rest is only there as tiny fractions, which means you won't see clear gaps in the spectrum but only slight deviations to the anticipated black-body radiation... There is a whole range of techniques available to astronomers though.
-
Down got a reaction from Funyarinpa in Astronomy
The simplest spectroscope you could imagine, and indeed what was used by astronomers a century or two ago, is a prism. A prism deviates each wavelength of light by a different angle and thus allows to view what we call the "spectrum" of the light, i.e. what wavelength we can find in it. Spectroscopy in general is very broad, though.
The explanation iamnoob gave is actually only partial: if you observed the light of the sun through a prism, as you know, you'd see a continuous spectrum (i.e. all the wavelength would be there). That's because the light emitted by stars does not come from the transitions of the atoms in it, but from what is called "black-body radiation", which is purely due to temperature. A physical body without particular other optical properties (hence the black-body term) will emit light according to its temperature, in the form of a continuous spectrum. The peak of this spectrum depends on temperature: on the surface of the sun, around 6000K, the center is around visible light. Cooler stars will look red, hotter stars blue. For bodies at ~300K (30°C) it would be pretty far in the infrared. Yes, we do radiate too.
What happens then is that a part of that black-body radiation is absorbed by the molecules within the stars (the absorption spectrum of a molecule is simply the complementary of its emission spectra), creating small gaps in the otherwise continuous spectrum (not really visible with the naked eye and a simple prism). We can compare those gaps with the known emission spectras of various molecules we test on earth and match them onto the star's spectra.
Emission spectras are more useful when we want information on other stuff like gas clouds in the interstellar medium. Molecules in those regions can get into excited states because of all the shit going around (cosmic rays etc) and then emit light at specific wavelengths which allows us to identify them.
Of course that's only the basics of it: in reality it's more complicated. Stars are mostly made of hydrogen, so it's very easy to see the marks of hydrogen in a spectrum. There's also a bunch of Helium, but the rest is only there as tiny fractions, which means you won't see clear gaps in the spectrum but only slight deviations to the anticipated black-body radiation... There is a whole range of techniques available to astronomers though.
-
Down got a reaction from Chronopolis in Astronomy
The simplest spectroscope you could imagine, and indeed what was used by astronomers a century or two ago, is a prism. A prism deviates each wavelength of light by a different angle and thus allows to view what we call the "spectrum" of the light, i.e. what wavelength we can find in it. Spectroscopy in general is very broad, though.
The explanation iamnoob gave is actually only partial: if you observed the light of the sun through a prism, as you know, you'd see a continuous spectrum (i.e. all the wavelength would be there). That's because the light emitted by stars does not come from the transitions of the atoms in it, but from what is called "black-body radiation", which is purely due to temperature. A physical body without particular other optical properties (hence the black-body term) will emit light according to its temperature, in the form of a continuous spectrum. The peak of this spectrum depends on temperature: on the surface of the sun, around 6000K, the center is around visible light. Cooler stars will look red, hotter stars blue. For bodies at ~300K (30°C) it would be pretty far in the infrared. Yes, we do radiate too.
What happens then is that a part of that black-body radiation is absorbed by the molecules within the stars (the absorption spectrum of a molecule is simply the complementary of its emission spectra), creating small gaps in the otherwise continuous spectrum (not really visible with the naked eye and a simple prism). We can compare those gaps with the known emission spectras of various molecules we test on earth and match them onto the star's spectra.
Emission spectras are more useful when we want information on other stuff like gas clouds in the interstellar medium. Molecules in those regions can get into excited states because of all the shit going around (cosmic rays etc) and then emit light at specific wavelengths which allows us to identify them.
Of course that's only the basics of it: in reality it's more complicated. Stars are mostly made of hydrogen, so it's very easy to see the marks of hydrogen in a spectrum. There's also a bunch of Helium, but the rest is only there as tiny fractions, which means you won't see clear gaps in the spectrum but only slight deviations to the anticipated black-body radiation... There is a whole range of techniques available to astronomers though.